Publicación:
Del gobierno electrónico al big data: la digitalización de la gestión pública en Colombia frente al control territorial

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorGomis-Balestreri, Miguelspa
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-22 00:00:00
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-09T17:46:51Z
dc.date.available2017-11-22 00:00:00
dc.date.available2022-09-09T17:46:51Z
dc.date.issued2017-11-22
dc.description.abstractA pesar de sus problemas internos, Colombia es uno de los países latinoamericanos más entusiastas en relación con el gobierno electrónico. Las reformas inducidas por la implementación de políticas alineadas con los odm-ods, así como de la pacificación, han inducido una mejora en la capacidad colombiana de intervención en el territorio, donde la digitalización permitió llegar a ciudadanos tradicionalmente alejados de las administraciones. Sin embargo, surgen dudas sobre la coherencia de dicha estrategia. Los avances realizados suponen un desafío: ¿cómo afecta y es afectada la digitalización del sector público colombiano por la necesidad del Estado de fortalecer su control físico del territorio? Teniendo en cuenta dicho contexto, esta reflexión busca entender qué avances y problemas subyacen en la reconstrucción de la relación Estadociudadano, especialmente a partir del análisis de la digitalización en Bogotá.spa
dc.description.abstractDespite its internal problems, Colombia is one of the most forward-moving Latin American countries on the matter of electronic government. The reforms generated by the implementation of policies aligned with the Millenieum Development Goals – mdgs - and Sustainable Development Goals – sdgs - (mdg-sdg), as well as the peace process, have led to an improvement in the Colombian territorial capacity to intervene. In fact, digitalization has allowed for traditionally disconnected or far removed citizens to be reached by their designated territorial administrations. However, reservations arise about the consistency and coherence of this strategy. There exists a question about how the digitalization of the Colombian public sector affects and is affected by the State´s need to strengthen its physical presence in the territory. Taking into account this context, this exploratory analysis seeks to understand what advances and problems underlie in the reconstruction of the relationship between the State and its citizens, in particular through the analysis of digitization coordinated by the administration based in Bogota.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.format.mimetypetext/htmlspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/xmlspa
dc.identifier.doi10.18601/16578651.n21.03
dc.identifier.eissn2346-2159
dc.identifier.issn1657-8651
dc.identifier.urihttps://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/8882
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.18601/16578651.n21.03
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherFacultad de Finanzas, Gobierno y Relaciones Internacionalesspa
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/opera/article/download/5128/6196
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/opera/article/download/5128/6524
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/opera/article/download/5128/6820
dc.relation.citationeditionNúm. 21 , Año 2017 : Julio-Diciembrespa
dc.relation.citationendpage53
dc.relation.citationissue21spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage25
dc.relation.ispartofjournalOperaspa
dc.relation.referencesAl Nuaimi, E., Al Neyadi, H., Mohamed, N. y Al-Jaroodi, J. (2015). Applications of big data to smart cities. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 6 (1), 25. http://doi.org/10.1186/s13174-015-0041-5spa
dc.relation.referencesAlcaldía Mayor de Bogotá D.C. (2016). Plan distrital de desarrollo 2016-2020. Bogotá: Alcaldía Mayor.spa
dc.relation.referencesAldhuy, J. (2008). Au-dela du territoire, la territorialité? Géodoc, 35-42.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlemayehu, D. y Berger, M. L. (2016). Big Data: transforming drug development and health policy decision making. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 1-11. http:// doi.org/10.1007/s10742-016-0144-xspa
dc.relation.referencesAli, A., Qadir, J., Rasool, R. ur, Sathiaseelan, A., Zwitter, A. y Crowcroft, J. (2016). Big data for development: applications and techniques. Big Data Analytics, 1(1), 1-24. http://doi.org/10.1186/s41044-016-0002-4spa
dc.relation.referencesAndrejevic, M. y Gates, K. (2014). Big data surveillance: Introduction. Surveillance y Society, 12 (2), 185-196.spa
dc.relation.referencesAng, L.-M. y Seng, K. P. (2016). Big sensor data applications in urban environments. Big Data Research, 4, 1-12. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bdr.2015.12.003spa
dc.relation.referencesArcila Calderón, C., Monsalvo López, C., Ramos Cortés, A. y Santrich Garzón, C. (2014). Percepciones de los ciudadanos de Barranquilla (Colombia) frente al gobierno electrónico. Investigación y Desarrollo, 22 (1), 121-146.spa
dc.relation.referencesBasto, L. (2009). Concordancia entre el cumplimiento de los odm sobre pobreza, con los Planes Nacionales de Desarrollo de Colombia 2002-2010: evaluación con un modelo de cointegración. 105-124. Revista Equidad y Desarrollo, 11, 105-124.spa
dc.relation.referencesBennett, A. y Checkel, J. T. (2014). Process tracing: From philosophical roots to best practices. En Bennett, A. y Checkel, J. T. (eds.). Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool (pp. 3-37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139858472.003spa
dc.relation.referencesBovaird, T. (2003). E-Government and e-Governance: Organisational implications, options and dilemmas. Public Policy and Administration, 18 (2), 37-56. http://doi.org/10.1177/095207670301800204spa
dc.relation.referencesBrinkerhoff, D. (2005). Rebuilding governance in failed states and post-conflict societies: Core concepts and cross-cutting themes. Public Administration and Development, 25 (1), 3-14. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pad.352/fullspa
dc.relation.referencesBryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C. y Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 74 (4), 445-456. http://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12238spa
dc.relation.referencesBuschor, E. (2013). Performance management in the public sector: Past, current and future trends. Tékhne, 11 (1), 4-9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tekhne.2013.05.005spa
dc.relation.referencesCalude, C. S. y Longo, G. (2016). The deluge of spurious correlations in big data. Foundations of Science, 1-18. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-016-9489-4spa
dc.relation.referencesCaporaso, J. A. (2000). Changes in the westphalian order: Territory, public authority, and sovereignty. International Studies Review, 2, 1-28. http://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.00203spa
dc.relation.referencesCEPAL (2015). La Unión Europea y América Latina y el Caribe ante la nueva coyuntura económica y social. Santiago de Chile: cepal.spa
dc.relation.referencesCerrillo-i-Martínez, A. (2011). ¿Cómo facilitar el ejercicio de los derechos de los ciudadanos en la Administración electrónica? idp: Revista de Internet, Derecho y Política = Revista d’Internet, Dret I Política, 12, 31-43.spa
dc.relation.referencesChristensen, T., Lægreid, P., Roness, P. y Røvik, K. (2007). Organization theory and the public sector: instrument, culture and myth (First). New York, ny: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.spa
dc.relation.referencesClarke, A. y Margetts, H. (2014). Governments and Citizens Getting to Know Each Other? Open, closed, and big data in public management reform. Policy and Internet, 6 (4), 393-417. http://doi.org/10.1002/1944-2866.POI377spa
dc.relation.referencesConnelly, R., Playford, C. J., Gayle, V. y Dibben, C. (2016). The role of administrative data in the big data revolution in social science research. Social Science Research, 1-12. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.04.015spa
dc.relation.referencesCórdoba-Pachón, J.-R. y Orr, K. (2009). Three patterns to understand e-government: the case of Colombia. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 22, 532-554. http://doi.org/10.1108/09513550910982887spa
dc.relation.referencesCorrêa, A. S., Borba, C., Silva, D. L. y Corrêa, P. (2015). A fuzzy ontology-driven approach to semantic interoperability in e-government big data. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 5 (2), 178-181. http://doi.org/10.7763/IJSSH.2015.V5.448spa
dc.relation.referencesCriado, J. I. (2009). Entre sueños utópicos y visiones pesimistas. Madrid: Publica, Instituto Nacional de Administración.spa
dc.relation.referencesDávila, A. L. de G., Salazar Arbeláez, G. A. y González- Chavarría, A. (eds.). (2016). El conflicto en contexto. Un análissi en cinco regiones colombianas, 1998-2014. Bogotá D.C: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.spa
dc.relation.referencesDesouza, K. C. y Jacob, B. (2014). Big data in the public sector lessons for practitioners and scholars. Administration and Society, 1-22. http://doi.org/10.1177/0095399714555751spa
dc.relation.referencesEuropean Commission (2014). Multiannual indicative programme (mip) 2014-2017. Colombia. Bruselas: Unión Europea.spa
dc.relation.referencesFajardo-Heyward, P. (2015). Understanding the effect of security assistance on human rights:the case of plan Colombia. The Latin Americanist, 59 (2), 3-27.spa
dc.relation.referencesFinger, M. y Pécoud, G. (2003). From e-Government to e-Governance? Towards a model of e-Governance. En 3rd European Conference on E-Government (pp. 1-12).spa
dc.relation.referencesFloridi, L. (2012). Big data and their epistemological challenge. Philosophy and Technology, 25(4), 435-437. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-012-0093-4spa
dc.relation.referencesForbes, M. y Lynn, L. (2005). How does public management affect government performance? Findings from international research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15 (4), 559-584.spa
dc.relation.referencesFriedman, U. (2012). Anthropology of an idea big data. Foreign Policy, (196), 30-31.spa
dc.relation.referencesGalcera, I. A. (2012). La administración electrónica en España: de la “administración en papel” a la “e-administración”. Revista Chilena de Derecho y Ciencia Política, 3 (2), 109-139.spa
dc.relation.referencesGarrick, D., McCann, L. y Pannell, D. J. (2013). Transaction costs and environmental policy: Taking stock, looking forward. Ecological Economics, 88, 182-184. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.022spa
dc.relation.referencesGibson, E. L. (2012). Boundary Control. New York: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesGlaeser, E. L., Kominers, S. D., Luca, M. y Naik, N. (2016). Big Data and Big Cities: The promises and limitations of improved measures of urban life. Economic Inquiry. http://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12364spa
dc.relation.referencesGuzmán, C. A. (2004). Diseño y comunicación de instrumentos de medición del rendimiento en el marco de la nueva gestión pública. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 33 (123), 991-1023. http://doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2004.10779537spa
dc.relation.referencesHashem, I. A. T., Chang, V., Anuar, N. B., Adewole, K., Yaqoob, I., Gani, A. et al. (2016). The role of big data in smart city. International Journal of Information Management, 36 (5), 748-758. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.05.002spa
dc.relation.referencesHernández-Pérez, T., Rodríguez-Mateos, D., Martín- Galán, B. y García-Moreno, M. A. (2009). El uso de metadatos en la administración electrónica española: los retos de la interoperabilidad. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 32, 67-91. http://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2009.4.724spa
dc.relation.referencesJanssen, M. y van den Hoven, J. (2015). Big and Open Linked Data (bold) in government: A challenge to transparency and privacy? Government Information Quarterly, 32 (4), 363-368. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.11.007spa
dc.relation.referencesKalin, I. (2014). Open Data Policy Improves Democracy. sais Review of International Affairs, 34 (1), 59-70. http://doi.org/10.1353/sais.2014.0006spa
dc.relation.referencesKeller-McNulty, S. (2007). From data to policy: Scientific excellence is our future. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 102 (478), 395-399. http://doi.org/10.1198/016214507000000275spa
dc.relation.referencesKitchin, R. (2014a). Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data y Society, 1 (1). http://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714528481spa
dc.relation.referencesKitchin, R. (2014b). The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal, 79 (1), 1-14. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8spa
dc.relation.referencesKitchin, R. y Lauriault, T. P. (2015). Small data in the era of big data. GeoJournal, 80 (4), 463-475. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-014-9601-7spa
dc.relation.referencesKulshreshtha, P. (2008). Public sector governance reform: The World Bank’s framework. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21 (5), 556-567. http://doi.org/10.1108/09513550810885831spa
dc.relation.referencesKum, H.-C., Joy Stewart, C., Rose, R. A. y Duncan, D. F. (2015). Using big data for evidence based governance in child welfare. Children and Youth Services Review, 58, 127-136. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.09.014spa
dc.relation.referencesMaciejewski, M. (2016). To do more, better, faster and more cheaply: Using big data in public administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 0, 1-16. http://doi.org/10.1177/0020852316640058spa
dc.relation.referencesMahoney, J. (2012). The logic of process tracing tests in the social sciences. Sociological Methods y Research, 41 (4), 570-597. http://doi.org/10.1177/0049124112437709spa
dc.relation.referencesMassal, J. y Sandoval, Ca. G. (2010). Gobierno electrónico. ¿Estado, ciudadanía y democracia en Internet? Análisis Político, 68, 3-25.spa
dc.relation.referencesNanda, V. P. (2006). The “good governance” concept revisited. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 603, 269-283.spa
dc.relation.referencesOECD (2013). Colombia. Implementing Good Governance. Francia: oecd Publishing.spa
dc.relation.referencesOCDE (2014a). Estudio de la ocde sobre la política regulatoria en Colombia. Más allá de la simplificación administrativa. Francia: oecd Publishing.spa
dc.relation.referencesOECD (2014b). oecd Reviews of Innovation Policy: Colombia 2014. Francia: oecd Publishing.spa
dc.relation.referencesOehme, C. G. (2010). Plan Colombia: Reassessing the Strategic framework. Democracy and Security, 6, 221-236. http://doi.org/10.1080/17419166.2010.521055spa
dc.relation.referencesPerry, G. y Olivera, M. (2009). El impacto del petróleo y la minería en el desarrollo regional y local en Colombia (caf Working Papers 2009/06). Caracas: caf.spa
dc.relation.referencesPNUD (2015). Objetivos de Desarrollo del Milenio informe 2015 Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesPolidano, C. y Hulme, D. (1999). Public management reform in developing countries. Public Management Review, 1 (1), 121-132. http://doi.org/10.1080/14719037800000007spa
dc.relation.referencesPollitt, C. y Summa, H. (1997). Trajectories of reform: Public management change in four countries. Public Money y Management, 17 (1), 7-18. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9302.00051spa
dc.relation.referencesRaffestin, C. (1986). Territorialité: concept ou paradigme de la géographie sociale? Geographica Helvetica, 2 (2), 91-96.spa
dc.relation.referencesReschenthaler, G. y Thompson, F. (1996). The information revolution and the new public management. Journal of Public Administration Research, 6 (1), 125-143. Recuperado de http://jpart.oxfordjournals.org/content/6/1/125.shortspa
dc.relation.referencesRiascos, S. C., Martínez Giordano, G. y Solano, Om. J. (2008). El gobierno electrónico como estrategia de participación ciudadana en la administración pública a nivel de Suramérica -Casos Colombia y Uruguay. CollECTeR Iberoamérica, 1-10.spa
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez D., M. C. (2006). Investigación sobre el estado de avance del gobierno electrónico en Colombia a nivel municipal, regional y nacional. Bogotá D.C.: Cátedra Software ag-Alianza Sumaq en e-Government (Universidad de los Andes).spa
dc.relation.referencesRoski, J., Bo-Linn, G. W. y Andrews, T. A. (2016). Creating value in health care through big data: Opportunities and policy implications. European Physical Education Review, 8 (3), 1-8. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17506200710779521spa
dc.relation.referencesSack, R. D. (1983). Human territoriality: A theory. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 73 (1), 55-74.spa
dc.relation.referencesSanabria, P., Pliscoff, C. y Gomes, R. (2014). E-Government practices in South American countries: Echoing a global trend or really improving governance? The experiences of Colombia, Chile and Brazil. En Gascó-Hernández, M. (ed.). Open Government. Opportunities and Challenges for Public Governance (p. 216). Springer: Mila Gascó. http://doi.org/10.1787/9789264019959-enspa
dc.relation.referencesSanin, F. G. y Baron, M. (2006). Re-stating the state: Paramilitary territorial control and political order in Colombia (1978-2004). Crisis States Research Centre, destin, lse, Working Pa(66).spa
dc.relation.referencesStarr, P. K. (2002). Perfecting reform in Latin America: What role for the state? Latin American Research Review, 37 (2), 183-199.spa
dc.relation.referencesStreeck, W. y Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction: Instituional change in advanced political economics. En Streeck, W. y Thelen, K. (eds.). Beyond Continuity (pp. 1-39). Oxford: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesThies, C. G. (2005). Rivalry and state building in Latin America. American Journal of Political Sciencean, 49 (3), 451-465. http://doi.org/10.2307/3647725spa
dc.relation.referencesThompson, F. (2008). Las tres caras de la gestión pública. Gestión y Política Pública, xvii (2), 487-509.spa
dc.relation.referencesValencia Duque, F. J. (2012). El E-Control, estado actual y perspectivas en el control fiscal colombiano. En xvii Congreso Internacional del clad sobre la Reforma del Estado y de la Administración Pública (pp. 1-26), Cartagena, Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesVilloria, M. y Alujas, Á. R. (2013). Los modelos de gobierno electrónico y sus fases de desarrollo: u n análisis desde la teoría política. Gestión y Política Pública, 22, 69-103.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/opera/article/view/5128spa
dc.subjectE-governmenteng
dc.subjectgovernanceeng
dc.subjectnticseng
dc.subjectBig Dataeng
dc.subjectColombiaeng
dc.subjectBogotaeng
dc.subjecte-gobiernospa
dc.subjectgobernabilidadspa
dc.subjectnticspa
dc.subjectbig dataspa
dc.subjectColombiaspa
dc.subjectBogotáspa
dc.titleDel gobierno electrónico al big data: la digitalización de la gestión pública en Colombia frente al control territorialspa
dc.title.translatedFrom electronic government to big data: Digitalizing public management in Colombia in the face of terr itorial controleng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.localJournal articleeng
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dspace.entity.typePublication
Archivos
Colecciones
BAIA. OPERA - Artículos