Una aproximación a la sentencia judicial emitida por el Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea el 6 de septiembre de 2017 en relación con la crisis migratoria europea

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorHellman, Jacquelinespa
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-23 10:59:42
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-09T21:04:54Z
dc.date.available2020-04-23 10:59:42
dc.date.available2022-09-09T21:04:54Z
dc.date.issued2020-04-23
dc.description.abstractLos flujos migratorios no constituyen un fenómeno nuevo. No obstante, en la actualidad, los datos arrojados son alarmantes. De hecho, a finales del año 2016 se alcanzó un récord en la medida en que el número de personas desplazadas ascendió a 65,6 millones. En este sentido, debe señalarse que el continente europeo se ha visto especialmente afectado por esta crisis. Teniendo en cuenta lo anterior, debemos mencionar que algunos Estados Miembros de la Unión Europea han adoptado sus propias medidas, las cuales se han alejado -en ocasiones- de las premisas impuestas por la referida organización internacional. Ante esta situación, es relevante examinar la postura que mantuvo el Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea en un determinado caso que dio lugar a la esperada sentencia del 6 de septiembre de 2017.spa
dc.description.abstractMigrations flows are not a brand-new phenomenon. Nonetheless, in these last years, the findings are worrying. In fact, at the end of the year 2016, a record was reached as the number of displaced people amounted to 65.6 million. In this connection, it must be stressed that the European continent has been particularly affected by this crisis. Bearing this in mind, we have to mention that some Member States of the European Union have adopted their own strategies, which -in some occasions- have deviated far from the position imposed by the mentioned international organization. At this juncture, it is relevant to examine the approach that the Court of Justice of the European Union has had in one particular case, which resulted in the long-awaited judgment rendered on September 6, 2017.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/xmlspa
dc.format.mimetypetext/htmlspa
dc.identifier.doi10.18601/01229893.n46.04
dc.identifier.eissn2346-2051
dc.identifier.issn0122-9893
dc.identifier.urihttps://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/11108
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n46.04
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherDepartamento de Derecho Constitucionalspa
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/6501/8848
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/6501/9135
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/6501/9173
dc.relation.citationeditionNúm. 46 , Año 2020 : Mayo – Agostospa
dc.relation.citationendpage106
dc.relation.citationissue46spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage85
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRevista Derecho del Estadospa
dc.relation.referencesAbrisketa Uriarte y Juan Antonio. La reubicación de los refugiados: un déficit de solidaridad y una brecha en la Unión Europea. Comentario a la sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia de 6 de septiembre de 2017, asuntos c-643 y C-64/15 Hungría y Eslovaquia contra el Consejo. Revista General de Derecho Europeo, 44, 2018.spa
dc.relation.referencesArriba-Sellier, Nathan. Welcome refugees, adieu solidarité. Public Law, 2017.spa
dc.relation.referencesBamberg, Katharina. et De Somer, Marie, Policy Update October 2017. European Policy Centre, 2, 2017.spa
dc.relation.referencesBoldizsár, Nagy. Sharing the responsibility or shifting the focus? The responses of the EU and the Visegrad countries to the Post-2015 Arrival of Migrants and Refugees. IAI, 17, 2017.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrsakoska B azerkosk, Julija. The refugee relocation system in EU and its implications to the countries on the Western Balkans route: the aftermath of the flawed reception conditions in the eu. La Revue des Droits de l´Homme, 13, 2018.spa
dc.relation.referencesChetail, Vicent. The Common European Asylum System: Bric-à-brac or System? In Reforming the common European asylum system: the New European refugee law, Vincent,spa
dc.relation.referencesChetail, De Bruycker, Philippe and Maiani, Francesco (eds.), Brill, 2016.spa
dc.relation.referencesCollet, Elizabeth et Le Coz, Camille. After the storm. Learning from the EU response to the migration crisis. Migration Policy Institute Europe, 2018.spa
dc.relation.referencesDandashly, Assem. The European Union’s response to the Syrian conflict. Too little, too late… Global Affairs, 2 (4), 2016.spa
dc.relation.referencesGoig Martínez, Juan Manuel. La política común de inmigración en la Unión Europea en el sesenta aniversario de los tratados de Roma (o la historia de un fracaso). Revista de Derecho de la Unión Europea, 32, 2017.spa
dc.relation.referencesGonzález, José María Luque. Schengen. Un espacio de seguridad, libertad y justicia. Revista de Derecho, 21, 2004.spa
dc.relation.referencesGuild, Elspeth et al. The 2015 Refugee Crisis in the European Union. ceps Policy Brief, 332, 2015.spa
dc.relation.referencesHellman, Jacqueline et Molina, María José. The erosion of the European integration process due to certain restrictions of the free movement of persons. Revista Universitaria Europea, 22, 2015.spa
dc.relation.referencesKogovšek Šalamon, Neza. The principle of solidarity in asylum and migration within the context of the European Union accession process. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 24 (5), 2017.spa
dc.relation.referencesKukuk, Esin. The Principle of Solidarity and Fairness in Sharing Responsibilities: More than Window Dressing? European Law Journal, 22, 2016.spa
dc.relation.referencesLabayle, Henri. Solidarity is not a value: Provisional relocation of asylum-seekers confirmed by the Court of Justice (6 September 2017, Joined Cases C-643/15 and C-647/15 Slovakia and Hungary v. Council). Asylum, European Court of Justice, Solidarity, 2017.spa
dc.relation.referencesLehne, Stefan. The eu Remains Unprepared for the Next Migration Crisis. Carnegie Europe, 3, 1-7, 2018.spa
dc.relation.referencesMangas Martín, Araceli, Territorio, integridad territorial y fronteras del Estado en la Unión Europea. Revista Jurídica de la Universidad de León, 2, 2015.spa
dc.relation.referencesMartín Martínez, Magdalena. Los límites a la libre circulación de personas en la UE por razones de orden público, seguridad o salud pública en tiempos de crisis: una revaluación a la luz de la jurisprudencia del TJUE. Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo, 18 (49), 2014.spa
dc.relation.referencesMitsilegas, Valsamis. Humanizing solidarity in European refugee law: The promise of mutual recognition. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 24 (5), 2017.spa
dc.relation.referencesNoll, Gregor. Security in a Liberal Union: eu Asylum and Migration Control Policies. In The European Union: Facing the Challenges of Multiple Security Threats, 1-21, Bakardjieva-Engelbrekt, A., A. Michalski, N. Nilsson, L. Oxelheim, United Kingdom, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018.spa
dc.relation.referencesObradovic, Daniela. Cases C-643 and C-645/15: Enforcing solidarity in EU migration policy. European Law blog, 2017.spa
dc.relation.referencesOvádek, Michal. Legal basis and solidarity of provisional measure in Slovakia and Hungary v. Council. European Database of Asylum Law, 2017.spa
dc.relation.referencesŠabić, Šelo. The relocation of refugees in the European Union. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, 2017.spa
dc.relation.referencesSánchez Sánchez, Víctor. Refugiados, cautivos, esclavos y otros emigrados en el Antiguo Oriente Medio, Madrid, Tecnos, 2017.spa
dc.relation.referencesTimmermans, Christiaan. The Competence Divide of the Lisbon Treaty Six Years After. In The Division of Competences between the EU and the Member States, 19-33, S. Garben & I. Goavere, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2017.spa
dc.relation.referencesUçarer, Emek. Mare Nostrum or Solidarity of Inaction? European Union’s Responses to the Unfolding Refugee and Burden-Sharing Crisis. Paper prepared for Biennial Conference of the European Union Studies Association, Miami, May 4-6.spa
dc.rightsJacqueline Hellman - 2020spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/6501spa
dc.subjectRelocation system;eng
dc.subjectprinciple of solidarity;eng
dc.subjectmigratory movements;eng
dc.subjectCourt of Justice of the European Unioneng
dc.subjectSistema de reubicación;spa
dc.subjectprincipio de solidaridad;spa
dc.subjectmovimientos migratorios;spa
dc.subjectTribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europeaspa
dc.titleUna aproximación a la sentencia judicial emitida por el Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea el 6 de septiembre de 2017 en relación con la crisis migratoria europeaspa
dc.title.translatedAn approach towards the judgment rendered by the Court of Justice of the European Union on September 6, 2017 regarding the European Immigration Crisiseng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.localJournal articleeng
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
Archivos
Colecciones
BAOA. Revista Derecho del Estado - Artículos